Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Pfollas "I see from your last entry that I have misunderstood what you were doing: I thought you were taking the old KDevelop4 handbook on UserBase as your starting point, but now I gather that you are actually working from a docbook version. This may pose a problem: The translations I copied over were for the KDevelop4 pages on UserBase and may not match up with the texts you got from the docbook. " -This is not true. In the start we will copy all the manual 4 and move it to manual 5. Some programmers in the chat told me that the docbook that exists at the Git has new updates. My task is to bring those updates to the manual 5 on UserBase, as a second step. Third step is to change only the UserBase to the latest kdevelop5 features not the docbook because we will have only one copy which will be the UserBase. But first I think we should check the pages already transferred for inconsistencies between the docbook text and the translated text on UserBase, so that we can mark the translation units that are not up to date. -Yes, we will do that. Parent MoreHistory View source Link toPfollas (talk) 11:07, 28 September 2017 Thats I relief :-). In that case we have no problem with the pages already created. Do I understand you correctly, that I can go ahead and transfer the remaining pages from the KDevelop4 wiki pages? If so, I can probably get it done over the weekend. I guess you were asking if there is an easy way to get pure text out of a docbook? I'm afraid this is not the case. Parent MoreHistory View source Link toClaus chr (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2017 yes, go ahead and move the remaining pages :) :). and Yes this is what I was asking. You see my bad english brought this mess. But I believe everything are ok now. Parent MoreHistory View source Link toPfollas (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2017 I have now copied the content of all remaining KDevelop4 manual pages to the KDevelop5 manual including translations. Parent MoreHistory View source Link toClaus chr (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2017 Thank you very much. I will do the second step in the following days. Parent MoreHistory View source Link toPfollas (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2017 The second step is done!!!!! I have updated the wiki for kdevelop 5 manual to be the same as the docbook at git. Thanks to this guy <tosky> from kdevelop chat. He showed me the history of the docbook and told which changes I have to make. ( look from 2013 -04-29 https://cgit.kde.org/kdevelop.git/log/doc/kdevelop/index.docbook ). Now We are doing the nice meat! We will update most of the docs there so I can be valid for kdevelop 5.1.2!!!! Step three starts the next days!!! Parent MoreHistory View source Link toPfollas (talk) 19:39, 14 October 2017 Retrieved from "https://userbase.kde.org/Thread:User_talk:Pfollas/The_new_KDevelop_manual_(2)/reply#The_new_KDevelop_manual_2667"