Talk:Applications/Education: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Yes, you can ;-) And thanks for the reply. --[[User:Sordon|Sordon]] 22:41, 21 June 2010 (CEST) | ::Yes, you can ;-) And thanks for the reply. --[[User:Sordon|Sordon]] 22:41, 21 June 2010 (CEST) | ||
: The translated version of the deleted unit still appears in the Danish page - is that supposed to happen? Should I remove it manually? --[[User:Claus chr|Claus chr]] 06:55, 22 June 2010 (CEST) | |||
:: That's because I was busy and hadn't yet marked the new version for translation. You will probably see a FUZZY there now, I'm guessing, until you remove the translation. You should never edit translated files outside the system, so if you need to ping me to mark something, please do so. Just now I'm working on agreeing typographical standards with the docbook producers, so all pages will need edits to bring them into line. That's going to take all my spare time, so it might seem a bit slow at first. --[[User:Annew|annew]] 17:26, 22 June 2010 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 15:26, 22 June 2010
The image (Rocs.png) for the application Rocs was missing, giving an error-message in the page. To get rid of this, I replaced the image with White32.png. Claus chr 07:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Icon missing
Seems that Rocs doesnt have an application icon yet, thanks for fixing the error message so far!
Why change of links?
The current version of the page has the following note: The applications below all link to their KDE Education pages. But in the actual version all links were changed to UserBase internal links. Should this information now be maintained on two different pages or is it planned to move all the information to the UserBase? --Sordon 17:57, 21 June 2010 (CEST)
- Argh! Sorry about that. On Thursday(?) the server had a really bad crash in which the indexes were damaged. The result was that a small number of pages appeared as totally blank. We listed them all and reverted them to the last good version. I knew that the Parley Manual was among the affected ones. The links all seem to be pointing to the userbase pages now, so perhaps that comment is a carry over from the earlier times? In case you are wondering, I didn't change them - the Edu team did that. Unless you know anything different I think you should just delete that statement. Can I leave it to you? --annew 22:17, 21 June 2010 (CEST)
- Yes, you can ;-) And thanks for the reply. --Sordon 22:41, 21 June 2010 (CEST)
- The translated version of the deleted unit still appears in the Danish page - is that supposed to happen? Should I remove it manually? --Claus chr 06:55, 22 June 2010 (CEST)
- That's because I was busy and hadn't yet marked the new version for translation. You will probably see a FUZZY there now, I'm guessing, until you remove the translation. You should never edit translated files outside the system, so if you need to ping me to mark something, please do so. Just now I'm working on agreeing typographical standards with the docbook producers, so all pages will need edits to bring them into line. That's going to take all my spare time, so it might seem a bit slow at first. --annew 17:26, 22 June 2010 (CEST)