Thread history

From Talk:Translation Workflow
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User Activity Comment
08:21, 4 June 2011 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
08:20, 4 June 2011 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
18:34, 4 October 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
18:05, 4 October 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
14:13, 4 October 2010 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
07:29, 4 October 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
05:49, 4 October 2010 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
10:43, 3 October 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
19:15, 2 October 2010 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
12:50, 2 October 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
16:37, 30 September 2010 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
16:36, 30 September 2010 Claus chr (Talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Summary of Bullet Lists discussion)
15:50, 30 September 2010 Annew (Talk | contribs) New thread created  

Sometimes an author splits a bullet list with an empty line to make it more readable. This is disastrous for the translated pages. If you meet this, please correct the English page which will cause the re-marking for translation.

annew15:50, 30 September 2010

I strongly agree. In fact, anything enclosed between some sort of brackets should be kept in one unit, i.e. without blank line in the middle. If for some reason such content must have blank lines, and so be divided in two units, please balance brackets in each unit by adding matching brackets in a comment, as fx

[[ <!--]]--> ...

with similar comments for other kinds of brackets. Unbalanced brackets (including ordinary parentheses) creates lots of problems for translators.

I was wondering, by the way, if a

<br />

could replace a completely blank line in case it really is needed?

Claus chr16:36, 30 September 2010

I have added a section to your Build page. Please let me know whether it works.

annew12:50, 2 October 2010
 

It works! the lines before and after the <br /> appear in the same translation unit.

Claus chr19:15, 2 October 2010

I have added a section to Typographical_Guidelines. Please check that the instruction is clear and amend if necessary.

annew10:43, 3 October 2010
 

I think it is very clear. I added two sections on keeping units together and on balancing brackets. Do they belong there?

Claus chr05:49, 4 October 2010
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 08:20, 4 June 2011

Might they be better in Edit Markup? While we want to avoid duplicating sections (maintenance, etc.), a link between Typographical_Guidelines and EditMarkup would be sensible. Can I leave you to deal with this? Thanks

annew07:29, 4 October 2010
 
Edited by author.
Last edit: 08:21, 4 June 2011

I'm sorry, but Edit Markup is protected, so I can't edit it.

Claus chr14:13, 4 October 2010

Oops - I forgot that we marked the Help pages as protected. I've done the edit. Sorry.

annew18:05, 4 October 2010