Other languages:English • dansk • italiano • українська Contents 1 Lancelot and Kickoff 1.1 Lancelot's benefits 1.1.1 More powerful search capabilities 1.1.2 Application browsing 1.1.3 Logout and related options 1.1.4 Devices 1.1.5 Better Plasma integration 1.2 Lancelot's disadvantages 1.2.1 Special requirements 1.2.2 First impression 2 Lancelot and KRunner 2.1 Lancelot's advantages 2.1.1 More common keyboard navigation 2.2 Lancelot's disadvantages 2.2.1 Complexity of the UI 2.2.2 Help 3 Lancelot and KMenu Lancelot and Kickoff Lancelot's benefits More powerful search capabilities In the beginning, Kickoff had very limited searching capabilities that couldn't be even compared to KRunner and Lancelot. This was changed in KDE SC 4.4 when code from Lancelot's search was ported to Kickoff. Still, although Kickoff now uses the same engine for searching as Lancelot, since it runs in the same process as the desktop itself, most data providers (called runners) are disabled to prevent unstable ones crashing the whole desktop. (even the calculator is disabled) Lancelot runs in a separate process, so it can handle the risk of using potentially risky runners thus providing all the features KRunner itself does. Application browsing When browsing application tree in Kickoff, you can only see the currently open category, and to return to the previous one you need to click the 'back button'. In Lancelot, you always have an overview of the previous levels you opened while browsing, and in addition, you have a breadcrumb bar. Logout and related options In Lancelot, options such as Log Out, Switch Users etc. are accessible the instant you open the menu. In Kickoff, those are located in a separate section. Devices Lancelot provides quick access to both removable and fixed devices. Better Plasma integration Apart from the look and feel which is completely Plasma themed, Lancelot sports a few other integration points from both developer's and user's perspective. One of the trivial examples is that Lancelot can be used as an alternative to the Add widgets dialogue. Lancelot's disadvantages Special requirements Although the initial sizes of Lancelot and Kickoff don't differ that much, making Lancelot's window smaller would render it barely usable which is not the case with Kickoff. First impression On the first start, Lancelot looks more complicated and less screenspace-economic than Kickoff - two-columns plus section buttons versus one column that Kickoff sports. Lancelot and KRunner Lancelot and KRunner are rather different programs - one is all-in-one application launcher while the other is only a searching interface. For that reason, only the searching experience will be covered in the comparison. Lancelot's advantages More common keyboard navigation For navigating the search results, Lancelot uses Up and Down keys while KRunner uses the Tab key. Lancelot uses the Tab key for the search box completion, while it also supports the End key used for the same purpose in KRunner. Lancelot's disadvantages Complexity of the UI KRunner sports a very sleek and simple user interface, with vastly superior screenspace economy. Help KRunner provides information about the syntax of each runner. Lancelot and KMenu KMenu and KickoffMenu are meant to be speedy, simple application menues meant for easy application browsing. On the other hand, there are a vast number of users who want only that - a speedy, predictable and simple menu which worked so well in the days of KDE 3.x. Retrieved from "https://userbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Lancelot/Comparison&oldid=435332" Category: Plasma This page was last edited on 17 July 2019, at 09:11. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.