Talk:Yakuake: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
RogueScholar (talk | contribs) (Add statement in opposition) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+1 to archive and redirect to manual. [[User:Claus chr|Claus chr]] ([[User talk:Claus chr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC) | == Proposal for deletion == | ||
* +1 to archive and redirect to manual. [[User:Claus chr|Claus chr]] ([[User talk:Claus chr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
WikiWed - agree redirect, probably to apps page as no manual, but has the same info --[[User:Nvrwhere|Nvrwhere]] ([[User talk:Nvrwhere|talk]]) 17:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | :* WikiWed - agree redirect, probably to apps page as no manual, but has the same info --[[User:Nvrwhere|Nvrwhere]] ([[User talk:Nvrwhere|talk]]) 17:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
::{{Respond|minus2|Strongly oppose}} I think deleting this page, or any other about a KDE application still in active development is ill-advised and movement in the wrong direction. So long as a page exists, there is the possibility that people will see it and add to it; that is the very essence of a wiki. However if no page exists at all, suddenly the barrier to contribution is much, much higher, and typically not something a casual visitor will even consider. If the content here is outdated, the solution is to update it, not delete it. It's okay if you're not keen to do that yourself, but please at least leave room for the possibility that others might. [[User:RogueScholar|RogueScholar]] ([[User talk:RogueScholar|talk]]) 08:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:22, 14 July 2024
Proposal for deletion
- WikiWed - agree redirect, probably to apps page as no manual, but has the same info --Nvrwhere (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Strongly oppose I think deleting this page, or any other about a KDE application still in active development is ill-advised and movement in the wrong direction. So long as a page exists, there is the possibility that people will see it and add to it; that is the very essence of a wiki. However if no page exists at all, suddenly the barrier to contribution is much, much higher, and typically not something a casual visitor will even consider. If the content here is outdated, the solution is to update it, not delete it. It's okay if you're not keen to do that yourself, but please at least leave room for the possibility that others might. RogueScholar (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)