Should we also display the Creative Commons license? and if so, is the summary sufficient, or should the whole license be displayed?
My preference would be for the summary to be displayed together with a link to the full text. --annew 17:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
As far as I know, GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 is not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, so maybe we should change it to version 1.3.--Qiii2006 13:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Qt - triple LGPL, GPL, commercial - MySQL - GPL and comercial license
can choose which license suits you. Until I hear to the contrary, we'll leave this alone. Thanks for drawing attention to it, though. --annew 19:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
You cannot post new threads to this discussion page because it has been protected from new threads, or you do not currently have permission to edit.