Jump to content

Translations:Konqueror/14/zh-tw: Difference between revisions

From KDE UserBase Wiki
Qiii2006 (talk | contribs)
m Created page with "自奇趣公司(Trolltech)在Qt 4.5 中將Webkit 移植進它們的工具箱(toolkit),到處都有爭論有關用Webkit 替換Konqueror 中的KHTML。但是,因為KHT..."
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 13:10, 28 June 2011

Information about message (contribute)
This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Konqueror)
Since Nokia ported '''Webkit''' into their toolkit in ''Qt 4.5'', there has been a lot of discussion about replacing '''KHTML''' with '''Webkit''' in '''Konqueror'''. The KDE developers have written a '''WebKit''' component '''(KPart)''' which can replace '''KHTML''' which is still the default rendering engine. At some point in the future that default might change, but for now the '''WebKit KPart''' is an optional component you will have to install if you want to use it. Besides '''Konqueror''', there are a few other KDE browsers in development which make use of '''WebKit''' by default, ([http://code.google.com/p/arora/ Arora] and [[Special:myLanguage/Rekonq|Rekonq]], for example.)

自奇趣公司(Trolltech)在Qt 4.5 中將Webkit 移植進它們的工具箱(toolkit),到處都有爭論有關用Webkit 替換Konqueror 中的KHTML。但是,因為KHTML 仍然處於活躍的開發狀態,及被KDE 核心函數庫(core libraries)所依賴,所以不管是Konqueror 或任何其他能夠預覽HTML 檔案的程式都不會替換成Webkit。 "webkitkde" 項目開發了一個Webkit KPart,但僅僅處於開發階段,並不推薦廣泛使用。而且另一個問題是Qt 中的Webkit 版本太舊,儘管有多個web 瀏覽器是用Qt 的Webkit 開發(比如說arora 以及 Rekonq),還沒有一個能推薦用於日常使用的。