Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Amarok/Manual/Suggested names for Amarok manual/reply (10): Difference between revisions
m Reply to Suggested names for Amarok manual |
m Reply to Suggested names for Amarok manual |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 07:47, 1 December 2011
Now I get it. Thank for the explanation. The proposed scheme will naturally have to be abandoned. I still wonder, if it is a good idea to have the deep nesting levels of some of the pages, such as
Amarok/Manual/Various/AmarokOnOtherPlatforms/OSX
Maybe it is still a good idea to shorten that to
Amarok/Manual/OSX
That should be OK for DocBook, right? (Off course, there may be other reasons for not doing this.)
Btw., the section name of the OSX page is "Amarok on OS X". Does that not create problems for DocBook? Should we make guidelines for manuals that ensures consistency between ToC, page names and chapter/section titles?