Talk:Table of equivalent applications: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it fair to list third-party Photoshop as Windows image editor, but use only KDE applications to fill the third column? | Is it fair to list third-party Photoshop as Windows image editor, but use only KDE applications to fill the third column? | ||
:Why would it not be fair? This isn't a point-scoring exercise. If people are coming from the world of Windows they are being told what applications KDE can offer to fill the same need. Nothing more than that. I do consider it a very sensible page to add. --[[User:Annew|annew]] 19:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | :Why would it not be fair? This isn't a point-scoring exercise. If people are coming from the world of Windows they are being told what applications KDE can offer to fill the same need. Nothing more than that. I do consider it a very sensible page to add. --[[User:Annew|annew]] 19:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I asked because of hesitation about adding non-KDE alternatives into the third column, e.g. I use Gimp and FF. At least, vlc and psi are both Qt based and look good in KDE out of the box. | |||
Revision as of 02:33, 29 September 2008
Is it fair to list third-party Photoshop as Windows image editor, but use only KDE applications to fill the third column?
- Why would it not be fair? This isn't a point-scoring exercise. If people are coming from the world of Windows they are being told what applications KDE can offer to fill the same need. Nothing more than that. I do consider it a very sensible page to add. --annew 19:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I asked because of hesitation about adding non-KDE alternatives into the third column, e.g. I use Gimp and FF. At least, vlc and psi are both Qt based and look good in KDE out of the box.